Wednesday, July 22, 2009

One Final Word On Skip Gates vs Cambridge.

Days like today prove why black blogs are so important, and why it's a shame that no other form of black media on a large scale exists. We had a spirited, diverse, sometimes contentious debate about what happened, and whether or not Gates was right or wrong. Everyone was respectful of the opinions of others. This is how the world as a whole should work. A lot more stuff would get done if it did.

One thing I think we can all agree upon is that none of us knows how we'd respond if placed in an identical situation. A recent poll showed that you guys pretty much agreed with this statement.

Personally, I'm glad that Gates lived to tell his story, and that this situation, regardless of how you view it, shows that this idealistic "post-racial" America many foolishly believed would arrive January 20th is little more than a media-manufactured pipe dream. If folks of all colors were able to speak as openly, and candidly as we do here all the time, something tells me we'd all be far better off. For that, I thank the dozens of members of AverageNation™ who weighed in on this issue today.

BTW, if you happen to decide to catch CNN's Black In America 2 tonight, you can join me and my compadres from The Retort for a live blog/chat, beginning at 9pm. Just click here to join the convo.

Regards,

AB

The Complex Case Of Skip Gates vs The Cambridge Police.

[Editor's Note: Yeah, I'm still hella busy, but I had to weigh in on this. I already know I'm gonna piss off more than a few of my readers, but I gotta give my 2 cents.]

The more I listen to the debate over the Henry Louis Gates/Cambridge Police incident, the more I'm thinking we mighta misread this one initially. At first, when I heard the facts, and read the police report, I thought "damn, we're still having to deal with this nonsense in 09'?" But upon further review, I remembered a few of things. 1) I have a family member (AverageMiddleBrother) who was a faculty member at Harvard for about 3 years. 2) I've been to Cambridge and Boston myself more times than I can count. 3) I'm also a black man.

That said, here are my random observations, in no particular order.

The Neighbor Was Right. Sorta. - Let's face it, this entire ordeal could have been short-circuited had the nosey assed neighbor just asked Gates if he needed some help, rather than overreacting and calling the cops. The area where Gates lives is affluent, very close to campus, and many of the homes there are leased to faculty (as Gates' was, he was on the phone with property management when the cop arrived) by the University. It's not a stretch to assume that he, a nearly 60 year old man with a walking cane and sedan service, just might be a faculty member himself. On the flipside, had some random Negro broken in Gates' house and this very same neighbor stood by and said nothing, Gates woulda been extra pissed upon return. As a guy who's had this sh*t broken into while apathetic neighbors more or less stood by and watched, without bothering to call police, I somewhat admire this woman's sense of community. She just went about it the entirely wrong way.

The Policeman Was Right. Sorta. - The cop was simply doing his job, responding to a report of a shady character trying to barge his way into a house. He shows up, sees Gates inside the house, asks for ID, and upon identifying Gates as a member of faculty, "appears" (based on the police report) to have been trying to leave the scene. Did this cop overreact by eventually arresting Gates after he proved residence? Perhaps. But again, is it such a stretch to ask a person for ID? No assault occurred, Gates didn't get his head busted. He was simply asked to verify his residence. What's really so wrong about that?

Gates Was Right. Sorta. - Here's the thing: Every sensible Black man knows by age 21 that there is a proper way to respond when confronted by the cops. Some of us are taught by our fathers, some of us learn by trial and error, but all of us should know that the man with the gun is going to win 99% of the time. I'd never, ever, ever condone not standing up for yourself when accused of something you didn't do, but that's not exactly the point of contention here. Smart money says to comply with what the cops ask of you, get the badge number (or something that can be used to identify the person), and report them after the fact if they were out of pocket. It's better to live and be wronged than be dead right. It's not fair, but life seldom is. Gates, an academic who's made a living of studying race relations, should definitely have known better. You don't hit a cop with the infamous "do you know who I am?" unless your name is Michael Jordan. You certainly don't help the situation by wailing out "This is happening because I'm a Black Man In America!" Duh, that's obviously true, but it means jack squat to the policeman. Gates should be happy he got away with the minor charge (since dropped) he did, rather than a bullet to the dome. That's usually how these things end.

Cambridge Ain't Boston. - I've read a lot of comments lumping Cambridge in with nearby Boston when it comes to general racial climate. Not true. If there's any such thing as a bastion of elitist liberal America (other than San Fran), it's Cambridge. The small city is extremely ethnically diverse, has a large native black population, a large immigrant population, a black female mayor, and has had several black police commissioners in the past. Anyone who's spent any amount of time knows it's just one river, but several worlds separated from Boston, which is legitimately one of the most offputting and hostile places I've ever personally visited. My brother, who did his postdoctoral studies at there, told me Cambridge (not to be confused with the campus of Harvard, which is yet another world of its own) is one of the most welcoming places he's ever lived. On the same note, he can count on one hand the number of times he ventured into Boston while living there.

Gates Isn't THAT Famous. - There's also a general feeling out there that the neighbor, as well as the policeman, should have known who Gates was, a sentiment echoed by Gates himself. This has to be the most ridiculous comment evar. How well do you actually know all the folks on your block? Do you guys realize that Harvard is literally the Pro Bowl of American academia? Every professor at Harvard is likely world renowned in his/her field. Saying Gates should be recognizable and well known to the general populace in Cambridge is like saying a casual basketball fan should easily be able to point out Michael Redd while watching the NBA All-Star game. Michael Redd is a nice player, but he's hardly the only star in his field. To the neighbor, Gates was probably just some guy she's passed once or twice on the quad. To the cop, Gates was little more than a suspect. Sorry, but this just how it is.

What We Can All Learn From This. - Reality is, in 2009, yes, police brutality still exists. Black men get their heads busted (or worse) erryday. But this case clearly isn't police brutality, and had Gates just exercised a bit more constraint, this whole thing might have been totally avoided. Just a note to anyone pulled over, or otherwise confronted by cops: if you ain't do nothin' wrong, you have nothing to worry about. Shut up, comply, get the badge number, and handle it the reasonable way. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

The Bottom Line - Everyone here overreacted. The neighbor should have asked questions rather than made assumptions. The policeman should have perhaps been more sensitive to the situation and let cooler heads prevail. And Gates definitely shouldn't have pulled the infamous "Do you know who I am?" card. The obvious problem here is that only one of these overreactors could have lost his/her life as a result of this situation. I'll let you all guess who that might have been.

Question: Am I waaaay outta bounds with this, or did Gates perhaps overplay the situation?

Poll Position - Should AB.com Get Out Of The Negro Nonsense Business?!?

Ya'll know AB.com is all about the upliftment of Black peoples of all races, and whatnot. This site's seldom mentioned, yet everpresent goal is to get folks to buy into taking The AverageBro Challenge™ and helping positively influence the next generation through mentoring, tutoring, and coaching, three things I do with regularity myself.

Of course, running a blog about coaching youth basketball everyday would get pretty boring, and honestly wouldn't pique the interest of many. The tepid response to last winter's The Basketball Diaries series is proof that folks don't really care a whole lot about what grassroots service looks like, even if it's told in the painstakingly witty style that should have gotten it nominated for a Black Weblog Award for Best Series. But then again, that's just my opinion.

While this site's bread and butter is my commentary on everyday events, perhaps few individual posts get the sort of views, comments, and attention of those that fall under the Negro Nonsense category. Lets face it, you can call it "talking down to people" or "being elitist", or whatever you prefer, but there's something funny about watching a young Negro pull $5,000 worth of Polos out of his closet[1], or a couple of guys compete in a Black Olympics of chicken and watermelon eating, or PacMac Jones makin' it rain $81,000 in singles for "visual effect" and blaming strippers for having the nerve to pick the money up.

I can't say why I post these sorts of videos and stories, other than as a reprieve from everyday banality. They aren't posted as a deterrent from foolishness, cause most of my readers don't do this sorta stuff anyway. It's not like my own readers are the sorts of folks who'd "make it rain $81k in singles". Sure, some of ya'll might "make it drizzle", but that's about it. Nope, I post these videos (which are always sent to me by readers, BTW) because I too, like to gawk at nonsense. Is there really anything so wrong about that? I mean, seriously, who doesn't find this clip absolutely hilarious?



Lately though, I'm rethinking this approach, because I've noticed an odd trend. Big-named sites like The Washington Post, The Detroit Free Press, and Crooks & Liars frequently feature my posts and send me lots of extra traffic as a result, but they always seem to highlight my Negro Nonsense-type posts, not the multitude of other far more nuanced (and better written) jawns I also do on the regular. Heck, even my shortlived NPR career was a result of me being discovered by a production assistant who liked a Negro Nonsense-type piece that I wrote. And I'm wondering if this is all a bad thing.

[Update: I'm am pulling the poll early. The results were pretty conclusive. Negro Nonsense stays, but I'll strive to add more context. I still hope the folks from Crooks & Liars link to my more serious posts, however.]

I don't purport to be a "representative of all blacks", despite this blog's title. But I wonder if the folks who visit me on a whim when referred from these other sites are actually seeing the regular content, or just here to gawk at the Negro Nonsense like I am we are. If so, do these posts do more harm (reinforcing negative stereotypes) than good (an uptick in hits, and the occasional reader who sticks around) in the long term? I can't really call it, and thus, today's question.

Question: Should AB.com stop running "Negro Nonsense" type stories, or are they a nice compliment to the usual, more nuanced pieces? Is it the responsibility of "black bloggers" to always put the "best foot forward", or is that too much to ask of any person?

[1] Funny, but true story. Yesterday, I got dressed for work and put on a brown Polo shirt. My wife (she didn't do this on purpose) also decided to dress our 2 year old in a brown Polo for school. So, we roll into the daycare pimpin' like a muv, and I just wanna yell out "WE BEEEEEEEN HAD POLO!!!!" But of course, I didn't.